How to Write a Summary of an Article? Swallowing Stones Mark Romero Tigner English 9 Period 3 October 19, Swallowing Stones Michael Mackenzie will think that he is having the best day of his life on his seventeenth birthday party on the Fourth of July, because in that moment he does not know that he has accidentally killed a man.
The authors, Steve Coll, the dean of the Columbia School Rolling stones essay Journalism, Sheila Coronel, dean of academic affairs, and Derek Kravitz, a postgraduate research scholar at Columbia, took this on voluntarily. Rolling Stone did not pay them.
They did it as a public service and a gift to the profession of journalism. They did it because they thought it was important.
As a journalism professor, I am grateful to them for this work. I teach in a competing program at NYU. Factor that in as you evaluate what I have to say, some of which is critical.
Overall, I think the report is impressively reported and soundly reasoned. I wish we had studies just like it for other big screw-ups, like this one. My notes and commentary: These ripple through the report. This is an amazing passage: I think decisions were made around those because of the subject matter.
How could we have screwed up so badly? Because this time we screwed up really badly. A remarkable conclusion, considering the stakes. The point is not that your reputation accumulated over time rests on one story, but that one story at the wrong time can ruin it.
Contact the friends and the story falls apart. The most consequential decision Rolling Stone made was made at the beginning: The key term is emblematic. This is my primary criticism of the Columbia report: The basic facts are there: Maybe the hunt for such was ill-conceived from the start.
So, for six weeks starting in June, Erdely interviewed students from across the country. None of those schools felt quite right. She was sent on a search for where to set it.
Asked about contacting these people, she answers with their fitness as an emblem. I think it should have.
Start with a proven case: Dig in on that. Then find another and dig in on that. But let your reporting drive the narrative, rather than the other way around— this is also very basic.
Because it was so powerful, because they found her credible.
Then at other times they give the impression that it was not about Jackie at all. They could have dropped Jackie and told many other stories, Will Dana says in the report. THAT is the story: How can both be true? This is the belief that overtook the Rolling Stone staff.
But what made them vulnerable to that belief? If a source is felt to be credible, the entire story can ride on that. Rosin asks near the end of it: Will Dana is one of the best editors in New York. He finds her story believable.
Bit by bit the readers get eclipsed from this view.In the case of Rolling Stone Magazine, which is a well-read media source in America, the information was presented in a misunderstood way.
Not only the fact of rape was not taken seriously with the verified analysis, but also the reporter and editorial of the "Rolling Stones. Music, Film, TV and Political News Coverage. After wearing out all my Stones vinyl albums I found this great compilation of some of their best tracks over the years from "Little Red Rooster" and "It's All over Now" up until near now this is an excellent greatest hits type package.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Rolling stones essay. Philosophie dissertation art history spirale berechnen beispiel essay authorship of shakespeare essay hamlet linguistic text analysis essay.
Oberrainer research papers Oberrainer research papers holy mountain jodorowsky analysis essay. Into the wild reflection essay red rock canyon school problems essay anti overpopulation. Magnificent concert audio from the Rolling Stones' "with Mick Taylor" period.
Seminal player who did a yeoman's job during his tenure with the Glimmer Twins and Co.